I n a democracy, civility is not optional. The reason is simple. Democracy describes the process of self-government. It calls for all members of the group to be equally represented in the making of collaborative decisions.

Civility is critical to the democratic process, because it protects the conditions under which  we can make decisions for ourselves. Without civility, we are unable to do the complex thinking that our democracy demands.

Declaration of IndependenceMaintaining civility is a shared responsibility..and an ongoing challenge.  As a rule, we are quick to make judgments about people  but slow to understand them.   If our democratic process is to work, we must somehow overcome this tendency.  Democracy demands an atmosphere of mutual respect. It should not be surprising, therefore, that the framers of our Constitution spent their first hours meeting in Philadelphia and setting the rules of civility that would govern their deliberations.

As Carol Berkin writes in A Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution:

Taking into account the presence of loquacious and combative personalities among the delegates, the Convention wisely agreed that no one should be allowed to speak more than twice on any issue each time it was raised. And when a member behaved badly, he could be ‘called to order by any other member, as well as by the President; and may be allowed to explain his conduct or expressions supposed to be reprehensible.

There were other rules as well, such as, “Whilst a member shall be speaking…[N]one shall pass between them, or hold discourse with another, or read a book, pamphlet or paper, printed or manuscript…”

James Madison carefully recorded these rules in his notes. As Belkin comments in her book, “This concern with creating an open and safe atmosphere for discussion ran like a leitmotiv throughout the early days of the convention.”

Ed Morrison is Director of the Purdue Agile Strategy Lab. He is also an adjunct professor at the University of the Sunshine Coast in Queensland, Australia. For the past five or six years, he has been developing new, agile approaches to strategy in open, loosely joined networks, a discipline he calls Strategic Doing. Prior to starting his economic development work, Ed worked for Telesis, a corporate strategy consulting firm. In this position, he served on consulting teams for clients such as Ford Motor Company, Volvo, and General Electric. He conducted manufacturing cost studies in the U.S., Japan, Mexico, Canada, Italy, Sweden, and France. Ed started his professional career in Washington, D.C., where he has served as a legislative assistant to an Ohio Congressman, staff attorney in the Federal Trade Commission, and staff counsel in the US Senate. He holds a BA degree cum laude with honors from Yale University and MBA and JD degrees from the University of Virginia.

Designing platforms to design ecosystems

Ecosystems form on top of platforms. Ecosystem design starts with platform design.  By designing the platform and guiding interactions on […]

Start-up and innovation ecosystems: Testbeds

It’s no surprise that academic research often lags behind market developments (Brown & Mawson, 2017). What if, to help us […]

The shiny attraction of tax cuts

Years ago, as I was working on consulting teams, we helped companies like GE globalize their production. That meant moving […]

Our out-dated thinking about communities

Our traditional approach to community development no longer works. Consider these facts: The opioid crisis is overwhelming our capacity to […]

To go quickly, go slowly (at first)

I (re)learned a valuable lesson this week. We design and guide new networks to move quickly, to be come more […]

Rebuilding our civic economy

Our future prosperity depends on developing new, collective habits of complex thinking together. At the Purdue Agile Strategy Lab, we […]